AC asynchronous motors are the most frequent motors used in industrial motion control systems as well as in main powered domestic appliances. AC asynchronous motors provide several advantages, including a simple and durable construction, low cost, low maintenance, and direct connection to an AC power source. On the market, there are many different types of AC asynchronous motors. Diverse motors are suitable for various applications. Like other motors, an AC asynchronous motor contains a stator that is fixed on the outside and a rotor that spins within, separated by a precisely designed air gap. Almost all electric motors use magnetic field rotation to spin their rotors. Asynchronous motors are the most commonly utilized electromechanical machinery in industrial applications. There have been several research on their control, as well as a variety of approaches for achieving high-performance speed drivers. The properties of asynchronous motors alter with time and under different operating situations. Even though much research has gone into developing artificial neural network techniques to estimate the speed of an asynchronous motor and some of the parameters such as flux and torque, there hasn’t been much work done on asynchronous motor speed estimation using artificial neural networks. The main purpose of this paper is to build a speed estimator for an asynchronous motor using a feed-forward artificial neural network. A mathematical model for the asynchronous motor is developed and implemented in MATLAB. A speed estimator is then developed using a feed-forward neural network and coupled to the asynchronous motor to estimate its speed. After that, simulations are done to see how well the proposed speed estimator performed.
[1] Toliyat, Hamid A., Emil Levi, and Mona Raina. “A review of RFO induction motor parameter estimation techniques.” IEEE transactions on energy conversion 18, no. 2 (2003): 271-283.
[2] Razzouk, A. Ba. “Field-Oriented Control of Induction Motors Using Neural-Network Decouplers.” IEEE Trans. Power Electronics 33, no. 4 (1997): 752-763.
[3] Denai, Mouloud Azzedine, and Sid Ahmed Attia. “Fuzzy and neural control of an induction motor.” Applied mathematics and computer science 12, no. 2 (2002): 221-234.
[4] Castaldi, Paolo, Walter Geri, Marcello Montanari, and Andrea Tilli.”A new adaptive approach for online parameter and state estimation of induction motors.” Control Engineering Practice 13, no. 1 (2005): 81-94.
[5] Fan, Liping, Yi Liu, and Ying Shu. “Loss-modelbased efficiency optimization control for asynchronous motor using fuzzy logic.” In Proceedings of the 29th Chinese Control Conference, pp. 4998-5002. IEEE, 2010.
[6] Bormio-Nunes, Cristina, João Pedro Serra, Fabiana Sinibaldi Barbosa, Mateus BS Dias, Reiko Sato Turtelli, MuhammadAtif, and Roland Grössinger. “Magnetostriction of Fe–Cr and Fe–Cr–B Alloys.” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 52, no. 5 (2016):1-4.
[7] Baskar, P. Midhun Antony Joseph, Nijesh Narayanan, and Rajesh Babu Loya. “Experimental investigation of oxygen enrichment on the performance of twin-cylinder diesel engine with a variation of injection pressure.” In 2013 International Conference on Energy Efficient Technologies for Sustainability, pp. 682-687. IEEE, 2013.
[8] Tao Xue, Zi-Jian Wan, Wei Xu, and Si Li, “The simulation of permanent magnet synchronous motor control system for an electric vehicle,” Proceedings of the 32nd Chinese Control Conference, Xi’an, China, pp. 7674-7679, 2013.
[9] Castagnini, Alessandro, Tero Känsäkangas, Jere Kolehmainen, and Pietro Savio Termini. “Analysis of the starting transient of a synchronous reluctance motor for direct-on-line applications.” In 2015 IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC), pp. 121-126. IEEE, 2015. Greece, 2018, pp. 704-709, DOI: 10.1109/ICELMACH. 2018.8506701, 2018.