Understanding the development of Self-Regulated Learning: An Intervention Study to promote Self-Regulated Learning in Vocational Schools

• Alexander, P. A., Dinsmore, D. L., Parkinson, M. M., & Winters, F. I. (2011). Self-regulated learning in academic domains. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 393–407). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
• Alheit, P., & Dausien, B. (2002). The ‘double face’ of lifelong learning: Two analytical perspectives on a ‘silent revolution.’ Studies in the Education of Adults, 34(1), 3–22.
• Artelt, C., Stanat, P., Schneider, W., & Schiefele, U. (2001). Lesekompetenz: Testkonzeption und Ergebnisse [Reading literacy: test design and results.]. In J. Baumert, E. Klieme, M. Neubrand,
• M. Prenzel, U. Schiefele, W. Schneider, P. Stanat, K-J. Tillmann, & M. Weiss (Eds.), PISA 2000. Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schüler im internationalen Vergleich [PISA 2000. Basic competencies of students in international comparison] (pp. 69–137). Leske + Budrich.
• Azevedo, R. (2009). Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-009-9035-7
• Azevedo, R., Johnson, A., Chauncey, A., & Burkett, C. (2010). Selfregulated learning with MetaTutor: Advancing the science of learning with MetaCognitive tools. In M. Khine & I. Saleh (Eds.), New science of learning: Computers, cognition, and collaboration in education (pp. 225–247). Springer.
• Bandura, A. (1999). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Universal Press.
• Bannert, M., Reimann, P., & Sonnenberg, C. (2014). Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students’ self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9(2), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9107-6
• Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi. org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1203_1
• Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education.
• Springer. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.
• Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
• Baumeister, R. F. (2005). Self-concept, self-esteem, and identity. In V. Derlega, B. Winstead, & W. Jones (Eds.), Personality: Contemporary theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 246–280). Wadsworth.
• Bernacki, M. L. (2018). Examining the cyclical, loosely sequenced, and contingent features of self-regulated learning: Trace data and their analysis. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 370–387). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
• Biggs, J. B. (1989). Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching. Higher Education Research & Development, 8, 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436890080102
• Biggs, J. B. (1993). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 12, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436930120107
• Boekaerts, M. (1992). The adaptable learning process: Initiating and maintaining behavioural change.
• Applied Psychology, 41, 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1992.tb00713.x
• Boekaerts, M. (1996). Personality and the psychology of learning. European Journal of Personality, 10(5), 377–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199612)10:5%3c377::AID-PER261%
• 3e3.0.CO;2-N
• Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-Regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199–231. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x
• Bolhuis, S. (2003). Towards process-oriented teaching for self-directed lifelong learning: A multidi- mensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 13(3), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959- 4752(02)00008-7
• Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10(2), 14–21.
• Buhi, E. R., Goodson, P., & Neilands, T. B. (2008). Out of sight, not out of mind: Strategies for handling missing data. American Journal of Health Behavior, 32(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.5555/ajhb. 2008.32.1.83
• Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis.
• Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170684
• Cheon, S. H., & Reeve, J. (2015). A classroom-based intervention to help teachers decrease students’ amotivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedps ych.2014.06.004
• Cleary, T. J., Slemp, J., & Pawlo, E. R. (2020). Linking student self-regulated learning profiles to achieve- ment and engagement in mathematics. Psychology in the Schools, 58(3), 443–457. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/pits.22456
• Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of read- ing, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honorof Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. Irvington.
• Cuyvers, K., Van den Bossche, P., & Donche, V. (2020). Self-regulation of professional learning in the workplace: A state of the art and future perspectives. Vocations and Learning, 13, 281–312. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s12186-019-09236-x
• Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming. Educational Phi- losophy and Theory, 41(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00475.x
• Davis, S. K., & Hadwin, A. F. (2021). Exploring differences in psychological well-being and self-regulated learning in university student success. Frontline Learning Research, 9(1), 30–43. https://doi. org/10.14786/flr.v9i1.581
• De Corte, E. (1996). Instructional psychology: Overview. In E. De Corte & F. E. Weinert (Eds.), Interna- tional encyclopedia of developmental and instructional psychology (pp. 33–43). Elsevier Science.
• De Corte, E. (2012). Constructive, self-regulated, situated, and collaborative learning: An approach for the acquisition of adaptive competence. Journal of Education, 192(2–3), 33–47. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0022057412192002-307
• De Corte, E. (2016). Improving higher education students’ learning proficiency by fostering their self- regulation skills. European Review, 24(2), 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798715000617
• De Backer, L., Van Keer, H., & Valcke, M. (2015). Socially shared metacognitive regulation during recip- rocal peer tutoring: Identifying its relationship with students’ content processing and transactive discussions. Instructional Science, 43(3), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9335-4
• De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., & Masui, C. (2004). The CLIA-model: A framework for designing power- ful learning environments for thinking and problem solving. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19, 365–384.
• De Naeghel, J., Van Keer, H., Vansteenkiste, M., Haerens, L., & Aelterman, N. (2016). Promoting ele- mentary school students’ autonomous reading motivation: Effects of a teacher professional devel- opment workshop. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(3), 232–252.  https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00220671.2014.942032
• De Smul, M., Heirweg, S., Van Keer, H., Devos, G., & Vandevelde, S. (2018). How competent do teach- ers feel instructing self-regulated learning strategies? Development and validation of the teacher self-efficacy scale to implement self-regulated learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 214– 225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.01.001
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical per- spective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). The University of Rochester Press.
• Deissinger, T., & Gonon, P. (2021). The development and cultural foundations of dual apprenticeships
• – a comparison of Germany and Switzerland. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 73(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1863451
• Dignath, C. (2016). What determines whether teachers enhance self-regulated learning? Predicting teachers’ reported promotion of self-regulated learning by teacher beliefs, knowledge, and self- efficacy. Frontline Learning Research, 4(5), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i5.247
• Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 231–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x
• Dignath, C., & Veenman, M. V. J. (2020). The role of direct strategy instruction and indirect acti- vation of self-regulated learning—Evidence from classroom observation studies. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09534-0
• Dignath, C., Büttner, G., & Langfeldt, H. (2008). How can primary school students learn self-reg- ulated learning strategies most effectively? A meta-analysis on self-regulation training pro- grammes. Educational Research Review, 3, 101–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02. 003
• Dubs, R. (2015). Gedanken zu Kompetenzen und zum selbstgesteuerten Lernen am Beispiel der Kom- petenz „Argumentieren“ [Thoughts on competencies and self-directed learning using the exam- ple of the competency “argumentation”.]. In A. Rausch, J. Warwas, J. Seifried, & E. Wuttke (Eds.), Konzepte und Ergebnisse ausgewählter Forschungsfelder der beruflichen Bildung [Concepts and results of selected fields of research in vocational education and training] (pp. 21–35). Schneider Hohengehren.
• Entwistle, N. (1991). Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment. Higher Education, 22(3), 201–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132287
• Ertl, H., & Sloane, P. F. E. (2004). The German training system and the world of work: The transfer potential of the Lernfeldkonzept. Berufs- Und Wirtschaftspädagogik, 7, 1–15.
• Forster-Heinzer, S., Holtsch, D., Rohr-Mentele, S., & Eberle, F. (2016). Do they intend to stay? An empirical study of commercial apprentices’ motivation, satisfaction and intention to remain within the learned occupation. Empirical Research on Vocational Education and Training, 8(16), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-016-0041-0
• Frey, A., & Terhart, P. (2010). Wie man Ausbildungsabbrüche vermeiden kann [How to avoid train- ing dropouts]. Blätter der Wohlfartspflege (BdW), 157(3), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.5771/ 0340-8574-2010-3-109
• Gillet, N., Vallerand, R. J., & Lafrenière, M.-A.K. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic school motivation as a function of age: The mediating role of autonomy support. Social Psychology of Education, 15(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-011-9170-2
• Gläser-Zikuda, M., Fuss, S., Laukenmann, M., Metz, K., & Randler, C. (2005). Promoting students’ emotions and achievement–Instructional design and evaluation of the ECOLE-approach. Learn- ing and Instruction, 15(5), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.013
• Goetz, T., Luedtke, O., Nett, U. E., Keller, M., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2013). Characteristics of teaching and students’ emotions in the classroom: Investigating differences across domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.08.001
• Gogol, K., Brunner, M., Goetz, T., Martin, R., Ugen, S., Keller, U., Fischbach, A., & Preckel, F. (2014). “My questionnaire is too long!” The assessments of motivational-affective constructs with three- item and single- item measures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(3), 188– 205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.04.002
• Gonon, P. (2017). Renaissance der dualen Berufsbildung durch Modernisierung [Renaissance of dual vocational training through modernization]. In P. Schlögl, M. Stock, D. Moser, K. Schmid, & F. Gramlinger (Eds.), Berufsbildung, eine Renaissance [Vocational training, a renaissance]? (pp. 44–60). Bertelsmann.
• Greene, J., & Azevedo, R. (2010). The measurement of learners’ self-regulated cognitive and metacog- nitive processes while using computer-based learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515935
• Greene, J. A., Bolick, C. M., Jackson, W. P., Caprino, A. M., Oswald, C., & McVea, M. (2015). Domain- specificity of self-regulated learning processing in science and history. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 111–128.
• Greene, J., Plumley, R. D., Urban, C. J., Bernacki, M., Gates, K. M., Hogan, K. A., Demetriou, C., & Panter, A. T. (2021). Modeling temporal self-regulatory processing in a higher education biology course. Learning and Instruction, 72, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.04.002
• Greeno, J. G. (2006). Learning in activity. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learn- ing sciences (pp. 79–96). Cambridge University Press.
• Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2018). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self- regulation of learning and performance (pp. 83–106). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
• Hanushek, E. A., Schwerdt, G., Woessmann, L., & Zhang, L. (2017). General education, vocational edu- cation, and labor-market outcomes over the lifecycle. Journal of Human Resources, 52(1), 48–87. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.52.1.0415-7074R
• Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170605 Himmelstein, P. H., Woods, W. C., & Wright, A. G. (2019). A comparison of signal-and event-contingent ambulatory assessment of interpersonal behavior and affect in social situations. Psychological Assessment, 31(7), 952–960. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000718
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psy- chologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
• Holtsch, D., Hartig, J., & Shavelson, R. (2019). Do Practical and Academic Preparation Paths Lead to Differ- ential Commercial Teacher “Quality”? Vocations and Learning, 12(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12186-018-9208-0
• Höpfer, (2017). Eigenaktivität als Lernchance: lernförderliches Potenzial und adaptive Unterstützung eigeninitiierter verbaler Handlungen von angehenden Kaufleuten [Self-activity as a learning opportunity: learning-promoting potential and adaptive support of self-initiated verbal actions of prospective merchants] (Dissertation). Universität Zürich. https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/ 147332/1/20173081.pdf
• Isen, A. M., & Reeve, J. (2005). The influence of positive affect on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Facilitating enjoyment of play, responsible work behavior, and self-control. Motivation and Emo- tion, 29(4), 295–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9019-8
• Isohätälä, J., Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2017). Socially shared regulation of learning and participation in social interaction in collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 81, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.10.006
• Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2012). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 25–43.
• Järvelä, S., & Bannert, M. (2021). Editorial. Temporal and adaptive process of regulated learning – what can multimodal data tell? Learning and Instruction, 72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc. 2019. 101268
• Jossberger, H., Brand-Gruwel, S., van de Wiel, M. W. J., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2020). Exploring students’ self-regulated learning in vocational education and training. Vocations and Learning, 13, 131–158.
• Karlen, Y., Hertel, S., & Hirt, C. N. (2020). Teachers’ professional competences in self-regulated learning: An approach to integrate teachers’ competences as self-regulated learners and as agents of self-regulated learning in a holistic manner. Frontiers in Education, 5, 159. https://doi.org/10.3389/ feduc.2020.00159
• Khaled, A., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2015). Occurrences and quality of teacher and student strategies for self-regulated learning in hands-on simulations. Studies in Continuing Education, 38, 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2015.1040751
• Khosa, D. K., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Productive group engagement in cognitive activity and metacognitive regulation during collaborative learning: Can it explain differences in students’ conceptual under- standing? Metacognition and Learning, 9, 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9117-z
• Kirschner, P., & Stoyanov, S. (2018). Educating youth for nonexistent/not yet existing professions. Educa- tional Policy, 34(3), 477–517.
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.
• Kramarski, B. (2008). Promoting teachers’ algebraic reasoning and self-regulation with metacognitive guidance. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9020-6
• Kramarski, B. (2018). Teachers as agents in promoting students’ SRL and performance: Applications for teachers’ dual-role training program. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regula- tion of learning and performance (pp. 223–239). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
• Kramarski, B., & Kohen, Z. (2017). Promoting preservice teachers’ dual self-regulation roles as learners and as teachers: Effects of generic vs. specific prompts. Metacognition and Learning, 12(2), 157–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9164-8
• Kramarski, B., Desoete, A., Bannert, M., Narciss, S., & Perry, N. (2013). New perspectives on integrating self-regulated learning at school. Education Research International, 1, 1–4. https://doi.org/10. 1155/2013/498214
• Lajoie, S. P., Zheng, J., Li, S., Jarrell, A., & Gube, M. (2021). Examining the temporal nature of affect and self regulation in the context of clinical reasoning. Learning and Instruction, 72, 1–14. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101219
• Lang, M., & Pätzold, G. (2006). Selbstgesteuertes Lernen – theoretische Perspektiven und didaktische Zugänge [Ways to promote self-directed learning in vocational training]. In D. Euler, M. Lang, &
• G. Pätzold (Eds.), Selbstgesteuertes Lernen in der beruflichen Bildung [Self-directed learning in vocational training] (pp. 9–35). Franz Steiner Verlag.
• Leidinger, M., & Perels, F. (2012). Training self-regulated learning in the classroom: Development and evaluation of learning materials to train self-regulated learning during regular mathematics lessons at primary school. Education Research International, 2012, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/ 735790
• Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., Holappa, J., Haataja, E., Huang, X., & Siipo, A. (2019). Going beyond what is visible: What multichannel data can reveal about interaction in the context of collaborative learn- ing? Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.030
• Martin, J. (2007). The selves of educational psychology: Conceptions, contexts, and critical considerations. Educational Psychologist, 42, 79–89.
• Martin, A. J., Papworth, B., Ginns, P., Malmberg, L.-E., Collie, R. J., & Calvo, R. A. (2015). Real-time motivation and engagement during a month at school: Every moment of every day for every student matters. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015. 01.014
• Masui, C., & De Corte, E. (2005). Learning to reflect and to attribute constructively as basic components of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 351–372. https://doi.org/ 10.1348/000709905X25030
• McCardle, L., & Hadwin, A. F. (2015). Using multiple, contextualized data sources to measure learners’ perceptions of their self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 10, 43–75. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11409-014-9132-0
• McCaslin, M., & Good, T. L. (1996). The informal curriculum. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.),
• Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 622–670). Macmillan.
• McCaslin, M., & Vriesema, C. C. (2018). Co-regulation: A model for classroom research in a Vygotskian perspective. In G. A. D. Liem & D. M. McInerey (Eds.), Big theories revised 2: Research on socio- cultural influences on motivation and learning (pp. 319–352). Information Age Publishing.
• McNeish, D., & Matta, T. (2018). Differentiating between mixed-effects and latent-curve approaches to growth modeling. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1398–1414. https://doi.org/10.3758/ s13428-017-0976-5
• Metzger, C., Nüesch, C., Zeder, A., & Jabornegg, D. (2005). Förderung und Prüfung von Lern- kompe- tenzen in der kaufmännischen Grundbildung [Promotion and testing of learning competencies in basic commercial education].
https://edudoc.ch/record/3844/files/Bericht%20Vorprojekt_definitiv_16.pdf?version=1
• Meyer, S., & Schlesier, J. (2021). The development of students’ achievement emotions after transition to secondary school: A multilevel growth curve modelling approach. European Journal of Psychol- ogy of Education, 1–21,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00533-5
• Molenaar, I. (2014). Advances in temporal analysis in learning and instruction. Frontline Learning Research, 2(4), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i4.118
• Molenaar, I., Sleegers, P., & van Boxtel, C. (2014). Metacognitive scaffolding during collaborative learn- ing: A promising combination. Metacognition Learning, 9, 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11409-014-9118-y
• Molenaar, I., Horvers, A., & Baker, R. (2021). What can moment-by-moment learning curves tell about students’ self-regulated learning? Learning and Instruction, 72, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. learninstruc.2019.05.003
• Molenaar, I., & Järvelä, S. (2014). Sequential and temporal characteristics of self and socially regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9, 75–85. Springer.
• Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: The role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 270–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cedpsych.2007.03.001
• Müller, F. H., Hanfstingl, B., & Andreitz, I. (2007). Skalen zur motivationalen Regulation beim Lernen von Schülerinnen und Schülern: Adaptierte und ergänzte Version des Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-A) nach Ryan & Connell [Scales of motivational regulation in student learn- ing: Adapted and augmented version of the Ryan & Connell academic self-regulation questionnaire (SRQ-A).]. Alpen-Adria-Universität.
• Musset, P. (2019). Improving work-based learning in schools. OECD social, employment and migration working papers, No. 233. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/918caba5-en
• OECD (2021). Teaching and learning in VET: Providing effective practical training in school-based set- tings. OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19), OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10. 1787/64f5f843-en
• Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research.
• Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
• Panadero, E., Kirschner, P., Järvelä, S., & Malmberg, J. (2015). How individual self-regulation affects group regulation and performance: A shared regulation intervention. Small Group Research, 46(4), 431–454.
• Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educa- tional Psychologist, 36(2), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4
• Park, S., Holloway, S., Arendtsz, A., Bempechat, J., & Li, J. (2012). What makes students engaged in learning? A time-use study of within- and between- individual predictors of emotional engagement in low-performing high schools. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 390–401. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10964-011-9738-3
• Patrick, H., & Middleton, M. J. (2002). Turning the kaleidoscope: What we see when self-regulated learning is viewed with a qualitative lens. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/ 10.1207/00461520252828537
• Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341.
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2005). Achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ) – User’s man- ual. Ludwig Maximilian Universität.
• Perry, N. E. (1998). Young children’s self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. Journal of Edu- cational Psychology, 90(4), 715–729. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.715
• Perry, N. E. (2013). Understanding classroom processes that support children’s self-regulation of learn- ing. In N. E. Perry (Ed.), Self-regulation and dialogue in primary classrooms (pp. 45–68). The British Psychological Society.
• Perry, N. E., & Drummond, L. (2002). Helping young students become self-regulated researchers and writers. The Reading Teacher, 56(3), 298–310.
• Perry, N. E., & Rahim, A. (2011). Studying self-regulated learning in classrooms. In B. J. Zimmerman &
• D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 122–136). Rout- ledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
• Perry, N. E., Brenner, C. A., & MacPherson, N. (2015). Using teacher learning teams as framework for bridging theory and practice in self-regulated learning. In T. J. Cleary (Ed.), Self-regulated learn- ing interventions with at-risk youth: Enhancing adaptability, performance, and well-being (pp. 229–250). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14641-011
• Perry, N. E., Mazabel, S., Dantzer, B., & Winne, P. (2018). Supporting self-regulation and self-determination in the context of music education. In G. A. D. Liem & D. M. McInerney (Eds.), Big theo- ries revisited 2: A volume of research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (pp. 295–318). Information Age Press.
• Perry, N., Lisaingo, S., Yee, N., Parent, N., Wan, X., & Muis, K. (2020a). Collaborating with teachers to design and implement assessments for self-regulated learning in the context of authentic classroom writing tasks. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 416–443. https://doi. org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1801576
• Perry, N., Mazabel, S., & Yee, N. (2020b). Using self-regulated learning to support students with learning disabilities in classrooms. In A. J. Martin, R. A. Sperling, & K. J. Newton (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology and students with special needs (pp. 292–314). Routledge.
• Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., R Core Team (2021). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–153. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/index. html
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452–502). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10. 1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learn- ing in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
• R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statisti- cal computing. https://www.R-project.org/index.html
• Raccanello, D., Brondino, M., Moè, A., Stupnisky, R., & Lichtenfeld, S. (2019). Enjoyment, boredom, anxiety in elementary schools in two domains: Relations with achievement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 87(3), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2018.1448747
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage.
• Reeve, J., & Halusic, M. (2009). How K-12 teachers can put self- determination theory principles into practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509 104319
• Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. National Academy Press.
• Rogat, T. K., & Adams- Wiggins, K. R. (2015). Interrelation between regulatory and socioemotional processes within collaborative groups characterized by facilitative and directive other-regulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 589–600.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.026
• Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink- Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29(4), 375–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2011.607930
• Rovers, S., Clarebout, G., Savelberg, H., de Bruin, A., & Merriënboer, J. (2019). Granularity matters: Comparing different ways of measuring self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 14(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09188-6
• Rozendaal, J. S. (2002). Motivation and information processing in innovative secondary vocational edu cation. Leiden University.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61(101860), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
• Sachs, M. E., Ellis, R. J., Schlaug, G., & Loui, P. (2016). Brain connectivity reflects human aesthetic responses to music. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(6), 884–891. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/scan/nsw009
• Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction- What can it tell us about metacognition and coregulation in learning? European Psychologist, 10(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1027/ 1016-9040.10.3.199
• Scherrer, V., & Preckel, F. (2019). Development of motivational variables and self-esteem during the school career: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Review of Educational Research, 89(2), 211–258. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318819127
• Schlomer, G. L., Bauman, S., & Card, N. A. (2010). Best practices for missing data management in coun- seling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018 082
• Schmitz, B., & Wiese, B. S. (2006). New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in self-reg- ulated learning: Time-series analyses of diary data. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(1), 64–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych. 2005.02.002
• Schmitz, B., Klug, J., & Hertel, S. (2012). Collecting and analyzing longitudinal diary data. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 181–195). Guilford Press.
• Sembill, D., Schumacher, L., Wolf, K. D., Wuttke, E., & Santjer-Schnabel, I. (2001). Förderung der Prob- lemlösefähigkeit und der Motivation durch Selbstorganisiertes Lernen [Promote problem-solving skills and motivation through self-organized learning]. In K. Beck & V. Krumm (Eds.), Lehren und Lernen in der beruflichen Erstausbildung [Teaching and learning in initial vocational training] (pp. 257–281). Leske + Budrich.
• Sembill, D., Wuttke, E., Seifried, J., Egloffstein, M., & Rausch, A. (2007). Selbstorganisiertes Lernen in der beruflichen Bildung. Abgrenzungen, Befunde und Konsequenzen [Self-organized learning in vocational education. Delimitations, findings and consequences]. Berufs- Und Wirtschaftspäda- gogik Online, 13, 1–33.
• Sembill, D., Seifried, J., & Dreyer, K. (2008). PDAs als Erhebungsinstrument in der beruflichen Lern- forschung – Ein neues Wundermittel oder bewährter Standard [PDAs as a survey instrument in professional learning research – A new silver bullet or proven standard]? Empirische Pädagogik, 22(1), 64–77.
• Sembill, D. (1999). Selbstorganisation als Modellierungs-, Gestaltungs- und Erforschungsidee berufli-chen Lernens [Self-organization as a modeling, design, and research idea of professional learn- ing.]. In T. Tramm, D. Sembill, F. Klauser, & E. G. John (Eds.), Professionalisierung kaufmän- nischer Berufsbildung: Beiträge zur Öffnung der Wirtschaftspädagogik für die Anforderungen des
• 21. Jahrhunderts. Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Frank Achtenhagen [Professionalization of commercial vocational education: Contributions to the opening of business education for the demands of the 21st century. Festschrift on the occasion of Frank Achtenhagen’s 60th birthday] (pp. 146–174). Peter Lang.
• Sembill, (2004). Abschlussbericht zu „Prozessanalysen Selbstorganisierten Lernens“ im Rahmen des DFG-Schwerpunktprogramms „Lehr-Lern-Prozesse in der kaufmännischen Erstausbildung“ [Final report on “Process Analyses of Self-Organized Learning” within the framework of the DFG priority program “Teaching-Learning Processes in Initial Commercial Training”].
https://www. uni-bamberg.de/fileadmin/uni/fakultaeten/sowi_lehrstuehle/wirtschaftspaedagogik/Dateien/Forsc hung/Forschungsprojekte/Prozessanalysen/DFG-Abschlussbericht_sole.pdf
• Sinha, S., Rogat, T. K., Adams-Wiggins, K. R., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2015). Collaborative group engagement in a computer-supported inquiry learning environment. International Jour- nal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(3), 273–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11412-015-9218-y
• Skinner, E., Saxton, E., Currie, C., & Shusterman, G. (2017). A motivational account of the under- graduate experience in science: Brief measures of students’ self-system appraisals, engagement in coursework, and identity as a scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 39(17), 2433– 2459. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1387946
• Snow, R. E. (1992). Aptitude theory: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_3
• Sonnenberg, C., & Bannert, M. (2019). Using process mining to examine the sustainability of instructional support: How stable are the effects of metacognitive prompting on self-regulatory behavior? Computers in Human Behavior., 96, 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.003
• Spruce, R., & Bol, L. (2015). Teacher beliefs, knowledge, and practice of self-regulated learning. Meta- cognition and Learning, 10(2), 245–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9124-0
• Su, Y.-L., & Reeve, J. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 159–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10648-010-9142-7
• van Velzen, J. H. (2004). Assessing students’ self-reflective thinking in the classroom: The self-reflective thinking questionnaire. Psychological Reports, 95, 1175–1186. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.95.3f. 1175-1186
• van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). Mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
• van Grinsven, L., & Tillema, H. (2006). Learning opportunities to support student self-regulation: Com- paring different instructional formats. Educational Research, 48(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00131880500498495
• van Hout-Wolters, B., Simons, R.-J., & Volet, S. (2000). Active Learning: Self-directed Learning and Independent Work. In R.-J. Simons, J. van der Linden, & T. Duffy (Eds.), New Learning (pp. 21–36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47614-2_2
• van Leeuwen, A., & Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning un primary and secondary education. Educational Research, 27, 71–89. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.edurev.2019.02.001
• van Velzen, J. H., & Tillema, H. H. (2004). Students’ use of self-reflective thinking: When teaching becomes coaching. Psychological Reports, 95, 1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.95.3f. 1229-1238
• Van Grinsven, L. (2003). Krachtige leeromgevingen in het Middelbaar Beroepsonderwijs: Effect op moti- vatie en strategiegebruik bij zelfregulered leren? [Powerful learning environments in secondary vocational education?] (Dissertation). Universiteit Leiden.
• Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Soenens, B. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion, 44, 1–31.
• Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(2), 159–176. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.lindif.2004.12.001
• Veenman, M. V. J., Wolters, V., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11409-006-6893-0
• Vermunt, J. D. (1995). Process-oriented instruction in learning and thinking strategies. European Journal of Psychology Education, 10(4), 325–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03172925
• Vermunt, J. D., & Donche, V. (2017). A learning patterns perspective on student learning in higher education: State of the art and moving forward. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9414-6
• Vriesema, C. C., & McCaslin, M. (2020). Experience and meaning in small-group contexts: Fusing observational and self and other dynamics. Frontline Learning Research, 8(3), 126–139. https:// doi.org/10.14786/flr.v8i3.493
• Walton, G. M., & Wilson, T. D. (2018). Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems. Psychological Review, 125(5), 617–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000115 Waytens, K., Lens, W., & Vandenberghe, R. (2002). ‘Learning to learn’: Teachers’ conceptions of their supporting role. Learning and Instruction, 12, 305–322.
• Weinstein, C. E., & Hume, L. M. (1998). Study strategies for lifelong learning. American Psychologi- cal Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10296-000
• Wild, K.-P., & Krapp, A. (1996). Die Qualität subjektiven Erlebens in schulischen und betrieblichen Lernumwelten: Untersuchungen mit der Erlebnis-Stichproben-Methode [The quality of subjective experience in school and workplace learning environments: Studies using the experience sampling method]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 24(3), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:7935
• Wild, K.-P., & Schiefele, U. (1994). Lernstrategien im Studium: Ergebnisse zur Faktorenstruktur und Reliabilität eines neuen Fragebogens [Learning strategies in college: Results on the factor struc- ture and reliability of a new questionnaire]. Zeitschrift Für Differentielle Und Diagnostische Psychologie, 15, 185–200.
• Wild, K.-P. (2001). Die Optimierung von Videoanalysen durch zeitsynchrone Befragungsdaten aus dem Experience Sampling [Optimizing video analytics with time-synchronized survey data from experience sampling]. In S. v. Aufschnaiter & M.Welzel (Eds.), Nutzung von Videodaten zur Untersuchung von Lehr-Lernprozessen: Aktuelle Methoden empirischer pädagogischer Forschung [Using video data to study teaching-learning processes: Current methods of empiri- cal educational research] (pp. 61–74). Waxmann.
• Winne, P. H. (2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.517150
• Winne, P. H. (2019). Paradigmatic dimensions of instrumentation and analytic methods in research on self-regulated learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2019.03.026
• Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlo-sky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
• Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pin- trich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). Academic Press. https:// doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50045-7
• Winstone, N. E., Nash, R., Rowntree, J., & Menezes, R. (2016). What do students want most from written feedback information? Distinguishing necessities from luxuries using a budgeting methodology. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(8), 1237–1253. https://doi.org/10. 1080/02602938.2015.1075956
• Wolters, C. A. (2011). Regulation of motivation: Contextual and social aspects. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 265–283.
• Wolters, C. A., & Brady, A. C. (2020). College students’ time management: A self-regulated learning perspective. Educational Psychology Review. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10648-020-09519-z
• Xu, J., Yuan, R., Xu, B., & Xu, M. (2014). Modeling students’ time management in math homework.
• Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.011 Yeh, Y.-C. (2012). Aptitude-treatment interaction. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 295–298). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_582
• Yu, C., Li, X., Wang, S., & Zhang, W. (2016). Teacher autonomy support reduces adolescent anxiety and depression: An 18-month longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence, 49, 115–123. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.03.001
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educa- tional Psychology, 81(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–40). Academic Press. https:// doi.org/10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50031-7
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attain- ment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845–862. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163397
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51
• Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
• Mathias Mejeh is senior researcher at the Institute for Educational Science at the University of Bern. His main research interests are self- and co-regulated learning, teaching and learning at school, inclusive education, and social network analysis. He is also interested in the combination of qualitative and quantitative research approaches within the framework of mixed methods research.
• Tanja Held is a postdoctoral researcher in educational science at the University of Bern. Her research focuses on the development of student motivation and emotions.