International Journal of Education & Psychology - Volumes & Issues - Volume 5: Jan 2018, Issue 5

Three Perspectives of Planning, Implementation, and Consistency in Instructional Coaching

Authors

Dr. Anupama Desai

DOI Number

Keywords

instructional coaching, student achievement, best practices, reflective practitioners

Abstract

School administrators are choosing or required to implement instructional coaching on their campuses to improve student-learning opportunities. The school community must be aware that effective instructional coaching is job embedded, encourages teachers to become reflective practitioners, and requires time to commit to the implementation. School administrators must support instructional coaches by ensuring there is significant time allotted to provide coaches time in the classroom to observe, provide feedback, and support classroom teachers in their practice and reflection. Instructional coaches build trust and rapport with the instructional staff by implementing best-practice protocols, providing feedback, and planning the next steps. The instructional staff must be disposed to take the feedback and be willing to implement best practices and reflect upon the process. This article reflects each author’s personal experiences in their roles as a school administrator, instructional coach, and classroom teacher with the distinct focus on instructional coaching from the practitioners’ diverse perspectives. Current research on instructional coaching is examined and discussed. Best practices for classroom implementation of instructional coaching are reviewed. The article concludes that implementing instructional coaching in a school setting requires the school administrator to engage all stakeholders to understand the diverse perspectives of the individuals involved in the process. Implementing instructional coaching in a school setting must include the instructional process and student achievement as priorities.

References

  1. Ahrend, G., Diamond, F., & Gillwebber, P. (2010). Virtual coaching: Using technology to boost performance. Chief Learning Officer, 9, 44–47. Retrieved from http://www.clomedia.com/2010/06/27/virtual-coaching-using-technology-to-boost- performance/
  2. Akhavan, N. (2011). The effects of coaching on teacher efficacy, individual academic optimism and student achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3465395)
  3. Bean, R., Draper, J., Hall, V., Vandermolen, J., & Zigmond, N. (2010). Coaches and coaching in reading first schools. Elementary School Journal, 111, 87–114. doi:10.1086/653471
  4. Brown, D., Reumann-Moore, R., Roseann, H., Jolley, B. C., Riffer, M., & du Plessis, P. (2007).
  5. Making a difference: Year two report of the Pennsylvania high school coaching initiative. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Action.
  6. Bruce, C., & Ross, J. (2008). A model for increasing reform implementation and teacher efficacy: Teacher peer coaching in Grades 3 and 6 mathematics. Canadian Journal of Education, 31, 346–370.
  7. Cassidy, J., Garrett, S., Maxfield, P., & Patchett, C. (2009). Literacy coaching: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. In J. Cassidy, S. D. Garrett, & M. Sailors (Eds.), Literacy coaching: Research and practice: 2009 CEDER yearbook (pp. 15–27). Corpus Christi, TX: Texas A&M.
  8. Chamberlain, K. (2008). Case study: Professional development that enhances teaching and learning (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3371525)
  9. Chou, C.-H. (2011). Teachers’ professional development: Investigating teachers’ learning to do action research in a professional learning community. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20, 421– 437.
  10. Cororan, T., McVay, S. I., & Riordan, K. (2003) Getting it right: the MISE approach to professional development. Philadelphia, PA: Philadelphia Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
  11. Coskie, T., Robinson, L., Riddle-Buly, M., & Egawa, K. (2005). From the coaches’ corner: What makes an effective literacy coach? Voices From the Middle, 12, 60–61. View publication stats
  12. Cotton, K. (2003). Principals and students achievement: What the research says. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  13. Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Soaring systems. Education Review, 24, 24–33. Retrieved from http://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/DarlingHammond.pdf
  14. Darling-Hammond, L. (2014, June 30). To close the achievement gap, we need to close the teaching gap. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/linda- darlinghammond/to-close-the-achievement_b_5542614.html

How to cite

Journal

International Journal of Education & Psychology

ISSN

2348-0785

Periodicity

Bi-Annually