International Journal of Dental Sciences & Research - Volumes & Issues - Volume 1: Dec 2021, Issue 2

A re-innovative radiographic technique for the evaluation of marginal bone loss around implants

Authors

Kanwardeep Singh Sohi, Sunil Kumar M.V, Harikesh Rao, Vela Desai, Monika Goswamy

DOI Number

Keywords

Hawe X- Ray Sensor Holder System, Dental X- Ray mesh gauge, Crestal Bone loss

Abstract

Standard dental radiographs allow the clinician to make an assessment of marginal bone loss around implants. Radiovisiography is useful as it produces an instant image at a lower radiation dose. Only a relatively small deviation from the correct angulation may make it difficult to compare with the baseline radiographs and evaluate marginal bone loss. In this article a radiographic technique with the help of intra- oral grid was used to evaluate the bone loss around the implants. The conventional intra oral holder with intra- oral grid was indexed by the use of soft  putty which helped in reproducing positioning of the holder for evaluation of crestal bone loss a er the implant placement around the implants.

References

  1. Carle E Misch. Dental implant prosthesis, St. Louis, Elsevier Mosby 2005.
  2. T, Zarb. G, Worthington. P, Eriksson. The long term efficacy of currently used dental implants; a review and proposed criteria of success. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial implants 1986; 1:1-34.
  3. Heny PJ. An alternate method for the production of accurate casts and occlusal records in the osseointegrated implant rehabilitation. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 58:694-7
  4. Cox JF, Pharoah M. An alternative holder for radiographic evaluation of tissue- integrated prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 56:338-41
  5. Duckworth JE, Judy PF , Goodson JM et al . A method for geometric and densitometric standardization of intraoral radiographs. J Periodontol1983; 54:435-40
  6. Meijer HJA, Steen WHA , Bosman F. Aiming device for standardized intraoral radiographs of alveolar crest around implants in lower jaw . J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68:318-21
  7. Jeffcoat MK, Reddy MS, Webber RL et al. Extraoral control of geometry for digital subtraction radiography. J Periodontol Res 1987; 22:396-02
  8. Wouters FR, Jon-And C, Frithiof L et al. A computerized system to measure interproximal alveolar bone levels in epidemiology, radiographic investigations I Methodologic study. Acta OdontolScand1988; 46:25-31.
  9. Reddy MS, Mayfield – Donahoo TL, Jeffcoat MK. A seminal automated computer assisted method for measuring bone loss adjacent to dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992; 3:28-31.
  10. Blum I R, Smith G A. A quick and simple method to obtain a radiographic evaluation of remaining alveolar bone height before implant placement. Australian Dental Journal 2002:47(3) 266-268.
  11. Janes F Fondriest and David C McClenahan. Fabricating radiographic stents in implant treatment planning. CDS review 1997:40-43.
  12. Luki C.K. Luk, Edmond H.N. Pow, Thomas K.L. Li, Chow T.W. Comparison of ridge mapping and cone beam computed tomography planning dental implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26:70-74
  13. Davies S. J , Gray R.J.M and Young M.P.J. Good occlusal practice in the provision of implant borne prostheses. British Dental Journal 2002;192(2): 79-88.
  14. Kullman L, Al – Asfour A, Zetterqvist Land Andersson L. Comparison of radiographic bone height assessments in panoramic and intraoral radiographs of implant patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007:22:96-100.
  15. De Smet E, Jacobs R, Gijbels F and Naert I. The accuracy and reliability of radiographic methods for assessment of marginal bone level around oral implants. DentomaxillofacRadiol 2002:31:176-181
  16. Snophia Suresh, Kumar T.S.S, Saraswathy P.K, Pani Shankar K.H. Periodontitis and bone mineral density among pre and post menstrual women: A comparative study. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology 2010; 14:30-34

How to cite

Journal

International Journal of Dental Sciences & Research

ISSN

-

Periodicity

Bi-Annual