International Journal of Dental Sciences & Research - Volumes & Issues - Volume 2: July 2022, Issue 1

Sagittal discrepancy assessment with different parameters in mandi Gobindgarh population: a cephalometric study

  • Published: July 2022
Download PDF
Google Scholar

Authors

Navpreet Singh, Jishna Vaghela, Sukhpal Kaur

DOI Number

–

Keywords

Beta angle, dysplasia, YEN angle, Wits appraisal

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to calculate mean value of ANB angle, Wits appraisal, beta angle, Yen angle, W angle and MKG angle for Mandi Gobindgarh population and also to find difference among these parameters.

Materials and methods: Total 80 cephalometric radiographs were taken from the department of Orthodontics & Dentofacial Orthopaedics. All radiographs were traced and values for each parameter were calculated. Statistical analysis was applied on data.

Results: Values of ANB angle, Wit’s appraisal, Beta angle, W angle, YEN angle, and MKG angle calculated for studied population were 4.4±2.02, 3.8±2.3, 28.5±4.8, 53.3±3.91, 120.5±5.09, and 56.6±6.69 respectively.

Conclusion: This study reported that the values of ANB angle and wits were towards class II malocclusion, but other parameters’ value fall in class I value.

References

  1. Potode NB et al. Norms for anterio-posterior assessment of jaw relationship in Maharashtra population.Int J Orthod Rehabil018;9(4):141-144.
  2. Bhad WA ET AL. A new approach of assessing sagittal dysplasia: the W angle. European Journal of Orthodon tics.2015;35:66-70.
  3. Binder R E 1979 The geometry of cephalometrics Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 13 : 258 – 263.
  4. Enlow D H 1966 A morphogenetic analysis of facial growth. American Journal of Orthodontics 52 : 283 – 299.
  5. Nanda R S. The rates of growth of several facial components measured from serial cephalometric roentgenograms. American Journal of Orthodontics.1995; 41 : 658 – 673.
  6. Baik CY, Ververidou M. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancy: The Beta angle. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126:100‐5.
  7. Kapadia RM, Diyora SD, Shah RB, Modi BN. Comparative evaluation of Yen angle and W angle and ANB angle, Wits appraisal and Beta angle for predicting sagittal jaw dysplasia: A cephalometric study. International Journal of Clinical Dentistry and Research, January-March 2017;1(1):26-31.
  8. Mittal A, Bohra S, Murali PS, Saidath K, Krishnanayak US. An evaluation of YEN and W angle in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. J Indian Orthod Soc 2016;50:26-30.
  9. Doshi R, Trivedi K, Shyagali T. Predictability of Yen angle & appraisal of various cephalometric parameters in the assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and man dible in Angle’s Class II malocclusion. People’s J Sci Res 2012;5(1):1-8.
  10. Trivedi R, Bhattacharya A, Mehta F, Patel D, Parekh H, Gandhi V. Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance. Prog Orthod 2015 Feb 25;16(3):2-10.
  11. Jain S, Raghunath N, Muralidhar VM. A comparison of W angle, Pi angle and Yen angle as an indicator for assessing anteroposterior skeletal dysplasia malocclusion among regional population: A cephalometric study. International Journal of Dental Research & Development 2018; 8(3): 29 40.
  12. Katti CG, Mohan A, Abhi A. Predictibility of ANB, Beta and YEN angles as anteroposterior dysplasia indicators in Gulbarga population. JIOS.2020;54(4):321-324.
  13. Neela PK, Mascarenhas R, Husain A. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: The YEN angle. World Journal of Orthodontics.2009; 10(2):147-51.
  14. Sachdeva K., SinglaA., Mahajan V., Jaj H., Seth V. Nanda M. Comparison of different angular measurements to assess sagittal skeletal discrepancy: a cephalometric study. IJODS. 2012; 4(2):27–30.
  15. Maharjan S, Lili C. Comparison of ANB angle, Yen angle and W angle in Chinese population. Orthodontic Journal of Nepal.2019;9(1):35-30.
  16. Soni G, Goel S, Gupta N, Kotecha T, Yadav N, Datar S. Comparative evaluation of Yen angle, W angle, ANB angle and Wits appraisal for predicting sagittal jaw dysplasia. Europeon Journal of molecular & Clinical Medi cine.2021;8(2):2234-2242.
  17. Alam MK, Qamruddin I, Muraoka R, Okafuju N. Va lidity of W Angle and YEN Angle in a sample from Pakistani and Bangladeshi populations. J Hard Tissue Biol 2014 Jul;23(3):351-356.
  18. Chachada A, et al. MKG angle: A true marker for maxillomandibular discrepancy. JIOS.2020;54(3):220-225. 19. Bien SM. A method of recording the key ridge. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1963: 619-626.

How to cite

–

Journal

International Journal of Dental Sciences & Research

ISSN

-

Periodicity

Bi-Annual

Leading Research Intensive & Industry Driven University
Study at Leading Research Intensive
& Industry Driven University

University Campus

Desh Bhagat University,
Off to NH-44, Amloh Road, Mandi Gobindgarh,
District Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab- 147301, India